<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Litton test in I've just been diagnosed</title>
    <link>https://onlinecommunity.cancercouncil.com.au/t5/I-ve-just-been-diagnosed/Litton-test/m-p/30357#M1679</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;it seems worth it to go for this&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;the statistical norm is you have a case like some other&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and respond to the 1 or 2 or 3 most common treatments.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2019 11:07:57 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>looker_labs</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-07-11T11:07:57Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Litton test</title>
      <link>https://onlinecommunity.cancercouncil.com.au/t5/I-ve-just-been-diagnosed/Litton-test/m-p/29728#M1572</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I just found out pop got this.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I was never informed this was code for genIV, a genetic test,&amp;nbsp; maybe.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have seen great results with this for breast cancer (78% confidence lvl)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;but my sample set 10000&amp;gt;n&amp;gt;5000&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;of 5k records indicates there is no statistical significance&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;in terms of certainty above 56% that this works for any type of cancers besides breast cancer.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(besides two or 3 or unidentifyable data points - luck?)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;No there are a couple of other specific, not as widespread cancers, in the population but not prostate cancer.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My latest understanding is that everyone has cancer 'built in' to thier genome to highly varying degrees&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and that the likelyhood of developing full blown cancer is dependent on exposure to carcinogens, free radicals etc even UV rays.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sorry this is highly disorganized.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;anyone know more about this?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;any real cases of + or - outcomes with prostate cancer or others?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2019 10:31:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://onlinecommunity.cancercouncil.com.au/t5/I-ve-just-been-diagnosed/Litton-test/m-p/29728#M1572</guid>
      <dc:creator>looker_labs</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-05-23T10:31:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Litton test</title>
      <link>https://onlinecommunity.cancercouncil.com.au/t5/I-ve-just-been-diagnosed/Litton-test/m-p/30077#M1630</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sorry, I'm not sure what a Litton test is.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;s,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2019 14:12:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://onlinecommunity.cancercouncil.com.au/t5/I-ve-just-been-diagnosed/Litton-test/m-p/30077#M1630</guid>
      <dc:creator>sch</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-10T14:12:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Litton test</title>
      <link>https://onlinecommunity.cancercouncil.com.au/t5/I-ve-just-been-diagnosed/Litton-test/m-p/30357#M1679</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;it seems worth it to go for this&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;the statistical norm is you have a case like some other&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and respond to the 1 or 2 or 3 most common treatments.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2019 11:07:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://onlinecommunity.cancercouncil.com.au/t5/I-ve-just-been-diagnosed/Litton-test/m-p/30357#M1679</guid>
      <dc:creator>looker_labs</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-07-11T11:07:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

