Hi Captain, I wasn't intending to be pedantic or getting you riled but not predanticisim. Firstly, its a descritpion of an invasive medical intervention so accuracy matters. Ventilation is not feeding. Secondly after nasal (or endo-tracheal) "intubation" another tube is placed - either, a naso or orgastric tube. The route (nose or mouth) depends on several factors as well as access of the route for the purpose. Hence nasal intubation is not naso-gastric tube placement. I have performed all 4 procedures in the field. Now I'm all for common sense, logic and patient experience but your comment about the "medical team" being:: "with only being able to provide evidence-based information that is considered to have been scientifically proven", makes no sense whatsoever. Exactly what other information would suggest best guarantees your cancer outcome if not scientifically validated information and technologies? And who wrote the very papers you are saying you have read on PubMed if not the same medical professionals (and researchers) involved in this area of patient care? As for the array of other information you speak of - more often than not it steers further and further away from medical reality based on solid science into areas of personal opinion, conjecture, conspiracy theories, psuedo-science, fakery and con artists with magic cures for cancer. And I can't say I understand what your phrase "data rational" means. Pubmed is but one source of medical literature on the web. There are many medical databases and many published papers, some excellent, some throw-away. Unless you understand oncology and related topics you are ill-advised to start interpreting papers you come across on the web. Unless you precisely waht it is you are looking for you are just as likely to find misleading articles, out of date information of ideas floated in academic circles but yet to be tested and validated with laborartory experimentation and human trials. The medical professionals involved in our care are trained, educated and experienced. They work in an incredibly complex and demanding area of medical care. How many cancer patients would your own specialist and nurses have treated, spoken to over the years? How many variations on a theme, different responses to treatement, different side effects would they have had to manage so each patient gets individualised treatment that works best for that patient? I suggested in my previous reply that we should go through our medical professionals when concerned about our care. You can always get another opinion - but not one from the web. That is neither logical nor sensible.
... View more