"I'm not interested in further dialogue with you.  I'm just adding an alternative viewpoint for anyone who happens to be seeking information here."   No, you're not. Tell the truth: You are attempting total character assassination of your opponent and I'm not unfamiliar with your cut and run tactic: ignore the bulk of your opponents post, focus on ridicule and viscious personal attack backed up only by fanciful allegations, pose what you perceive to be an impossible challenge and walk away leaving a trail of rubbish reinforced by the foulest gutter language.   Only the challenge (100,000 cured) isn't an impossible one to those wanting the truth: they are all around you everywhere. There are many alternative treatments. You just have to be prepared to read up and engage in live conversation with real people who have walked the walk.   That's it from me.     ... View more

My word Captain Australia you do have a lot to say for yourself! But little of value for anyone who disagrees with your viewpoint.   You have made thinly veiled accusations that I'm "Dangerously irresponsible", "stupid/paranoid/cruel". And yes, I take exception. And I take exception to your disingenuous post.  I mentioned just a few facts from the study,  but I clearly said,  ("read my lips") " anyone diagnosed with any form of cancer should read that study". You apparently didn't or you would know that it said (and I quote vervatim),  *_"The overall contribution was the sum total of the absolute numbers showing a 5-year survival benefit expressed as a percentage of the total number for the 22 malignancies._* so yes, it's an average and I didn't represent it as anything else! Anyone even reading the title of the study and that conclusion would understand that!   But it was such a low average that the authors finally concluded, "As the 5-year relative survival rate for cancer in Australia is now over 60%, it is clear that cytotoxic chemotherapy only makes a minor contribution to cancer survival. To justify the continued funding and availability of drugs used in cytotoxic chemotherapy, a rigorous evaluation of the cost-effectiveness and impact on quality of life is urgently required."   You  do have a perfect right - in Australia that is - to place such importance on an extra 2% as you yourself put it that you are prepared to wreck your immune system and undergo the horrors of losing hair and nails all while experiencing terrible ongoing nausea and a quality of life that that many oncologists have declared they wouldn't accept for themselves. All for an extra 2 chances in a hundred that you might be a 5 year cancer "survivor"!   You excuse me of libelling clinicians. I wouldn't do that because that's not my belief. Although it is a known fact that many GPs allow themselves to be swayed by drug company bribes, clinicians are just people doing what they've been taught. No, it is the pharmaceutical companies that have been guilty of raking in billions of dollars with little regard for human life. Let someone have an adverse reaction to a herbal and they squeal for tighter regulation, all the while their own drugs killing hundreds of thousands.   You also accuse me of "offering it as bald fact, the only fact,".  Actually, I offered many facts from my own story of losing my own very dear wife. I was very discreet in what I did offer. I have shared the information about the hormone disruptors in creosote publicly and have received thanks from many grateful women. That, Captain Australia is potentially life-saving information in a community where wood burners are widely used. I'm wondering, just what facts you feel I omitted? For you actually said very little that pertained to my post except to just engage in elephant-hurling!   Finally, you advise that people should just rely on the information from their doctor! Are you even aware that a doctor who advocates anything other than cut burn or poison is most likely to lose his licence to practice? Your advice would cut people off from making informed choice.    You make ridicule over my comments concerning statistics.  If you'd even done a 101 unit on Business Statistics you would know there are many subtle ways that statistics can be manipulated. But where you have the immense wealth of drug companies supervising statistical studies, corruption is not only possible it is inevitable and the last thing they want the public doing is listening to "mere anecdotal" evidence from real life that threatens their investment!. And yes, there are indeed hundreds of thousands. Their evidence? They are still walking around today, decades later!           ... View more

"In summary, there is no credible independent scientific evidence that gumbi gumbi extract has any effect on cancer." Of course there isn't Margaret! Do you really imagine ANY pharmaceutical company would allow such "scientific" information decimate the huge income they make from chemo? Why on Earth do you suppose they keep conventional medicine oriented around easily manipulated statistics rather than listening bto real life testimonies of hundreds of thousands of people cured - yes cured - for a few cents? ... View more

Are you speaking of Denise Ford?.   After losing my wife to Ovarian cancer I have some idea of what Denise went through. I take my hat off to Denise for her going through her 6 year battle. I  hope she had some quality of life and deepened her family relationships during this time. My wife passed after just 8 months from diagnosis  of stage 3 Ovarian. She had gone to the doctor over just a mild discomfort in the abdomen that she thought it wise to have checked out. Her next 8 months was mostly a hellish time for her as she battled to overcome, first the after- effects of debulking surgery and  the agonies of a bowel that all but closed up on her.   My dear wife wanted to use alternative treatments, but unfortunately she just didn't have the capacity for taking the very solid regime her naturopaths put her on. And the OC didn't give her the time for them to work. She had been referred to a specialist but by the time he came back from leave and "cleared his desk"  and delivered the diagnosis, the cancer had exploded in her abdomen to the point where she could only swallow a fraction of the tiniest meal.   She went for a 3 week cleanse at Living Valley Springs, where she learned the cause of her cancer: After cleansing a couple of weeks she was exuding creosote, which she had derived from breathing the wood smoke from two very inefficient wood burners over 3 decades.  She had had a 12 year menopause, but had never before got to the bottom of her hormonal imbalance. Cresote comprises a multitude of chemicals that disrupt the hormonal balance.   It seems that regular medicine is uninterested in finding the cause of a person's cancer. It is interested only in making money from the thousands of dollars raked in on chemo. But just how much does chemo help?  I discovered a study entitled "The contribution of cytotoxic chemotherapy to 5-year survival in adult malignancies". Anyone suffering cancer of any sort should look this up. Its all over then 'net. Performed by conventional medicine, it concluded the answer is 2.3% in Australia and 2.1% in the USA.  Not only that, but it is rarely used to extend life, but just to make the death process more comfortable!   The treating oncologist was very surprised - and indeed emotional - when his chemo failed to touch the cancer!   Gumbi Gumbi, and for that matter any other successful natural treatment will never see the light of day until Big Pharma finds they can extract, modify and patent the active ingredient. Until then it will remain very deliberately buried in a sea of negative reports and warnings while people continue to have their immune systems wrecked, being poisoned by chemo and in many places like New Zealand being bankrupted by it as well.   Cheers, Keith       ... View more