BCa is highly treatable if caught early. But 'treatable' here only means getting rid of the immediate tumour/s and any surrounding disease. BCa is highly recurrent, so a change in lifestyle is worth considering to maximise both handling the treatment and enhancing survival.
As to what treatment is best, there are different ideas. But perhaps best to bear in mind that lifestyle is thought to be behind 70% of BCa.
There's two schools of thought about whether to have the bladder out right away, or do watchful waiting (I have the latter, even tho' the worst diagnosis - G3/T3/N3/M1 - and in remission this last 30 months, after being told 2+ years ago that I had weeks to live; so there's hope!).
The best survival stats to date indicate it is best to have chemo first and then RC (radical cystectomy). However, RC has a 1%-3% mortality rate and up to 50% post-op serious complications.
See also: Improving Survival for Patients with Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Dr Ralph de Vere White: An overview of Chemo, RC & survival + new predictive diagnostic with an excellent presentation of the need to do chemo first, then RC with >10 node removal
http://www.urotoday.com/37/browse_categories/bladder_cancer/aua_ny_2009__improving_survival_for_patients_with_bladder_cancer__multimedia_presentation10052009.html
This states unequivocally that Chemo should precede TURB and RC for maximum survival chance.
A major review is that of Dr Bajorin:
http://www.asco.org/ascov2/MultiMedia/Virtual+Meeting?&vmview=vm_session_presentations_view&confID=55&trackID=3&sessionID=39
See: Update on T1HG disease - RC or Not RC? http://www.urotoday.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view_ua&id=222983 2
To reduce the chances of recurrence and probably extend survival:
Firstly, exercise - 30'-60' day, as vigorously as poss. I walk about 60' a day; sometimes jog for 30'. There's a mass of evidence that those who survive longer exercise more.
Nutrition: move to more fruit and veg and away from meat (especially processed meats - sausages of all types, bacon, etc; white meat if you can't resist). If you can afford it, organic. Juicing once day - a combo of broccoli, cauli, beetroot, ginger, pineapple, cucumber, apple, Brussel sprouts is my preferred. See also:
the 'orthodox medico who's found that CAM works' of Dr David Servan-Schreiber (check out his "Anti-Cancer: a new way of life") http://www3.mdanderson.org/streams/MDACCFlvPlayer2.html?xml=publicEd/config/Anti-Cancer_cfg.
and http://www.integrativeoncology-essentials.com/topics/FilesDownload_files/IO E%20Guide_V3.pdf ("Integrative oncology is no longer an “alternative” approach to cancer care. Increasingly, prestigious academic cancer centers (for example: Harvard, Memorial Sloan Kettering, MD Anderson, Duke, UCSF) are incorporating integrative oncology within their practice of taking care of patients living with and beyond cancer.")
Avoid sugar, fast-carbs (bread - but rye if you can't give up - pasta, potatoes), alcohol, coffee and perhaps dairy products.
Supplements: as well as a good background multi-vit/mineral (I use NutriShield monthly packs), Vit D3, then up to 12g/day of curcumin+piperene, boswelia, astralagus, and white/green tea for anti-cancer; probiotics, beta-glucan or similar immune boosting pills, mushrooms and their extracts. See http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/play/snake-oil-supplements/
I take or have taken graviola, spirulina, wheatgrass and pau d'arco tea in copious amounts.
My 'rule' is evidence-based supplementation with little or no known side-effects (nothing to loose).
I find feedback essential to see how I'm doing and as a motivator - indications of cancerousness by cancer markers (CEA, NMP-22), inflammation, body composition (weight, muscle-mass, fat).
Four things I'd add:
The orthodox overview is well shown in this and associated vids:
http://www.videojug.com/interview/bladder-cancer-prognosis-2#whats-the-average-prognosis-for-someone-diagnosed-with-bladder-cancer
And maybe the best anti-cancer website:
http://www.canceractive.com/Search.aspx?srch=bladder%20cancer
A good overview for women is:
http://www.urotoday.com/media/presentations/nmp22/bladder_cancer_and_women_3_3_2010/player.html
Check out the latest BCa stats on http://calendar.cancer.gov/aboutnci/servingpeople/snapshots/bladder.pdf
This shows that the oncologists don't seem to be making as much headway as their promoted treatments claim - incidents and mortality has been constant for 20 years, despite all the claims and money.
For another view on survival rates for BCa
http://www.cancer.org/docroot/CRI/content/CRI_2_2_3x_Survival_rates_for_bladder_cancer_44.asp
Note that all seemingly poor cancer survival rates are heavily front-loaded - that is, quite a few die quickly but a lot live a lot longer than the average. A lot of colleagues here have lived many years since being diagnosed with very bad BC - so it is possible to get by OK.
Best wishes, Ian